ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Machine learning-driven decision support for antibiotic optimization in typhoid fever based on patient profiles.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTyphoid fever remains a major Global public health concern, with treatment outcomes strongly influenced by antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and inter-patient variability. Determining the most appropriate antibiotic for an individual patient remains clinically challenging. Machine learning-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) offer a promising avenue for improving diagnostic precision and guiding antibiotic selection using routinely collected clinical data.
methodsWe developed a machine learning-based decision-support framework using XGBoost models to predict (i) treatment outcome (binary), (ii) suspected typhoid classification, and (iii) a resistance-proxy score from clinical and engineered features. Model performance was evaluated using AUROC for classification tasks and R
resultsThe treatment outcome classifier demonstrated strong generalization performance, achieving a test AUROC of 0.962 ± 0.010 and an overall accuracy of 90%. The suspected typhoid classifier achieved an AUROC of 0.902 ± 0.005 with an overall classification accuracy of 82%. The resistance-proxy regression model showed moderate predictive capacity (R
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using machine learning to simulate antibiotic selection in typhoid treatment using patient-level clinical profiles. It presents a machine learning-based decision-support framework for antibiotic optimization under uncertainty, with explicit relevance to antimicrobial resistance management in resource-limited settings. To our knowledge, this is among the first studies to integrate explainable machine learning with counterfactual drug simulation for antibiotic optimization in typhoid fever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.