ArticleBMC medical education2026
Exploring reflections of first-year medical students following the inaugural early clinical exposure program: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Faculty of Medicine, University of Ruhuna introduced Early Clinical Exposure (ECE) into Phase 1 of its revised curriculum starting in 2025. This program provides structured patient encounters to contextualize preclinical learning and ease the transition into clinical practice. Students complete reflective writing exercises as part of ECE, and this study analyzed their initial reflections following the first session of the programme to explore early perceptions, emotional responses, and learning insights.
methodsThis study adopted a qualitative, descriptive research design utilizing thematic analysis to explore first-year medical students' reflective narratives. All first-year students who submitted reflective narratives were included for this study. Thematic analysis was used to identify and interpret patterns within the reflective writings.
resultsA total of 290 students participated in the first ECE session, of whom 139 submitted reflective writings. After excluding submissions that were not aligned with the reflective writing prompt, 134 reflections (46%) were included in the analysis. Thematic analysis identified five major themes: (1) compassion and commitment to patient wellbeing (2), motivation and purpose for learning (3), familiarization with patient-based clinical learning (4), concerns about performance and (5) dissatisfaction with limited exposure.
conclusionReflections from first-year medical students following the inaugural early clinical exposure program revealed that it provided a meaningful bridge between preclinical learning and clinical experiences by enhancing motivation for learning, sensitizing students to core professional values such as compassion and patient-centeredness, and fostering an early appreciation of clinical competencies including communication and teamwork.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.