Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42121115›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2026

"Triggering the palliative intent"?: A qualitative implementation evaluation of a prognostication model for advanced dementia (PRO-MADE) in a geriatric tertiary care setting for the integration of early palliative care.

Araviinthansai Subramaniam, Woan Shin Tan, Hwee Teng Robyn Tan, Qing Wang, Yew Yoong Ding, Allyn Hum, PRO-MADE Implementation Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Araviinthansai SubramaniamGeriatric Education & Research Institute, 2 Yishun Central 2, 768024, Singapore, Singapore. subramaniam.araviinthansai@geri.com.sg.
Woan Shin TanGeriatric Education & Research Institute, 2 Yishun Central 2, 768024, Singapore, Singapore.
Hwee Teng Robyn TanInstitute of Policy Studies, National University of Singapore, 1C Cluny Road House 5, 259599, Singapore, Singapore.
Qing WangGeriatric Education & Research Institute, 2 Yishun Central 2, 768024, Singapore, Singapore.
Yew Yoong DingGeriatric Education & Research Institute, 2 Yishun Central 2, 768024, Singapore, Singapore.
Allyn HumDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Novena, 308433, Singapore, Singapore.
PRO-MADE Implementation Group

Funding

Temasek Foundation IPC Ltd TFC APP-APP-3-172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostication uncertainty in advanced dementia impedes timely palliative referrals. Despite rapid development of dementia prognostication models, most have not progressed beyond external validation, with implementation in routine clinical practice as part of the electronic medical record system remaining underexplored. Empirical gaps exist in understanding interdisciplinary perspectives from palliative and geriatric specialties regarding implementation complexities of such hospital-based innovations. This formative study evaluated implementation of a validated PROgnostic Model for Advanced DEmentia (PRO-MADE) as a clinical decision support tool in a Singapore tertiary care setting. PRO-MADE informs physicians of patients' one-year mortality risk to initiate end-of-life care plans, including inpatient specialist and community palliative care referrals.

methodsFocus group discussions and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders were analysed and triangulated through rapid deductive-inductive qualitative approach using template analysis, underpinned by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and its Outcomes Addendum. Through maximum variation purposive sampling, 30 professionals across the hospital and community settings participated in seven focus group discussions and two in-depth interviews. Twelve physician implementers from the geriatric medicine specialty, eight healthcare professionals from the palliative medicine specialty, and 10 community-based multidisciplinary palliative care professionals were involved.

resultsFive main themes characterise the complexities shaping PRO-MADE's adoption and implementation across key interrelated contextual domains: outer and inner settings (alignment with and operationalisation of palliative care related policies), inner setting and innovation (competing views between disciplines on workflow integrability in clinical practice), inner setting and individuals (alignment of implementation intent with clinical setting; accessibility and adaptation of the electronic medical record system for implementation), and outer setting and individuals (relevance of prognostication for palliative care delivery to patients and families). Findings reflect that implementing prognostication-informed care models involve navigating implementers' professional role and identity preservation in managing end-of-life care, compatibility with clinical practice, and family's needs and readiness.

conclusionsThis implementation research study uncovered factors at the structural, disciplinary identity, interprofessional and patient-caregiver-provider levels influencing PRO-MADE's adoption and implementation for end-of-life care planning and palliative support. Findings suggest the need for targeted implementation strategies, including early stakeholder engagements and adapting integration to clinical settings and patient-family needs to optimise implementation success.

Indexed as

DementiaPalliative CareAgedFemaleFocus GroupsGeriatricsHumansMalePrognosisQualitative ResearchSingaporeTertiary Health CareDementiaElectronic medical recordEnd-of-life careImplementation scienceMortalityPredictive modelQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42121115
PMCPMC13217709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.