ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Comparison of early postoperative dry eye after KLEx and FS-LASIK: a contralateral eye study.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare early postoperative dry eye outcomes in contralateral eyes of the same patients undergoing Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction (KLEx) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), with tear film osmolarity defined as the primary outcome measure.
methodsThis study was conducted at Dunyagoz Izmır Hospital and involved patients who underwent corneal refractive surgery between June 2021 and December 2024. Patients with pre-existing dry eye disease were excluded from the study. Patients underwent KLEx in one eye and FS-LASIK in the fellow eye. Tear film osmolarity (primary outcome) was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using the TearLab
resultsA total of 34 eyes of 17 patients (7 females and 10 males) were evaluated. Group 1 (KLEx) included 17 eyes and group 2 (FS-LASIK) included contralateral 17 eyes. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 34.2 days. Mean tear osmolarity was 297.7 ± 8.3 mOsm/L in the group 1 and 315.3 ± 10.2 mOsm/L in the group 2 (p < 0.001). Mean tBUT was 10.3 ± 3.1 s for group 1 and 7 ± 2.32 s for group 2 (p < 0.001). The mean postoperative OSDI scores were 32.5 for group 1 and 42 for group 2, with a preoperative baseline of 10.2 (both groups; p < 0.001).
conclusionsKLEx demonstrated superior early postoperative ocular surface stability compared to FS-LASIK in contralateral eyes. The procedure resulted in significantly less tear hyperosmolarity and better subjective comfort, suggesting it may be a preferable surgical option for minimizing dry eye induced by corneal refractive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.