ArticleBMC microbiology2026
The effects of feeding guild, seasonality, and warming on the gut microbiomes of Antarctic echinoderms.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntarctic marine food webs are expected to be significantly impacted by future climate change. In particular, the recent rapid regional warming in the West Antarctic Peninsula has, and will continue to have, a negative impact on endemic marine biodiversity. However, despite the growing recognition of the role microbial symbionts play in mediating responses to environmental change, microbiome characterisation has been conducted for only a small fraction of the marine invertebrates in the Southern Ocean. Our study examined the effects of feeding guild, seasonality, and experimental warming (6 months at + 2 °C) on the gut microbiome of six species of near-shore marine Antarctic echinoderms sampled from waters off Rothera Research Station, Antarctica. Our study used 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 region, with analyses including measurements of alpha and beta-diversity alongside co-occurrence network analyses.
resultsOf the six invertebrate species sampled in winter, peak species diversity values in gut microbiomes were observed in the omnivores, Ophionotus victoriae and Sterechinus neumayeri, with lower values in the scavenger/predator, Odontaster validus, and the suspension feeders, Cucumaria georgiana, Echinopsolus charcoti, and Heterocucumis steineni. In the seasonal experiment, H. steineni bacterial gut species diversity doubled from winter to early summer yet decreased by a similar magnitude during the same period in O. victoriae. Despite these opposing diversity trends, both species displayed similar increases in the relative abundances of Bacteroidota and Bacillota in winter and early summer in their gut microbiomes. Bacterial diversity in the gut microbiome of the sea cucumbers E. charcoti and H. steineni, was not impacted by six-months at + 2 ˚C above ambient, although C. georgiana displayed a decrease in observed ASVs following this treatment.
conclusionsThese results suggest a strong influence of feeding guild and seasonality on the gut microbiomes of these invertebrates. There appeared to be little effect of warming (+ 2 °C) on the taxonomic composition of the gut microbiomes of the three holothurians. This highlights the need to examine the functional significance of experimental warming treatments using metabolomics and transcriptomics alongside microbial species diversity analyses to understand whether gut microbiomes can aid resilience under future climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.