ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Comparative analysis of salt tolerance and associated physiological traits in wild and cultivated barley at the seedling stage.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSoil salinity poses a significant threat to global agricultural production. Wild barley (H. spontaneum), the ancestor of cultivated barley, offers valuable genetic diversity for stress adaptation. This study compared salt tolerance among six barley varieties (two wild barley, two salt-tolerant, and two salt-sensitive cultivated barley), by employing analysis of root/shoot growth and physiological traits under salt stress conditions.
resultsTo explore the physiological basis of salt tolerance differences among six barley varieties, multiple indicators including photosynthetic capacity, ion homeostasis, stomatal regulation, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging ability were analyzed. Additionally, tissue damage was assessed using histological staining and fluorescence imaging techniques, and the accumulation differences of sodium ions (Na
conclusionBy integrating multiple physiological indicators, this study clarified the differences in physiological characteristics among wild barley, salt-tolerant cultivated barley, and salt-sensitive cultivated barley. Additionally, we identified specific physiological limitations of current salt-tolerant cultivated varieties compared to wild barley. These findings provided reference for future breeding strategies to develop salt-tolerant barley.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.