ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of perilla meal protein by single-factor test and response surface methodology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study adopted single-factor tests integrated with response surface methodology (RSM) based on Box-Behnken design (BBD) to improve and optimize the microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) technique for protein extraction from perilla meal. Four major parameters (material-liquid ratio, extraction pH, microwave power, microwave time) were screened and evaluated in preliminary trials, and their favorable ranges were determined as 1:15, 8-10, 400 W and 120 s, respectively. On this basis, BBD was employed to further refine three core variables: extraction pH, microwave power, and microwave time, and a quadratic regression model was constructed. Analysis of variance verified the model was statistically significant and highly reliable (F = 30.48, p < 0.0001), with a satisfactory goodness-of-fit. A distinct synergistic interaction between extraction pH and microwave power toward protein yield was detected, whereas interactive impacts between microwave time and the other two variables were not significant. The magnitude of influence on protein yield followed: microwave time > microwave power > extraction pH. The model predicted a peak protein yield of 31.3276% under the optimized conditions: pH 10.02, 398.63 W, 115.45 s. Validation experiments yielded an actual yield of 30.9309 ± 0.1036% (n = 3), which closely matched the predicted value, confirming the precision and industrial applicability of the model. This work established a high-efficiency MAE protocol for perilla meal protein and supplied a scientifically sound and scalable technical foundation for industrial application and high-value valorization of this underused plant protein resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.