Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42120903›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Human gloss perception reproduced by tiny neural networks.

Takuma Morimoto, Arash Akbarinia, Katherine R Storrs, Jacob R Cheeseman, Hannah E Smithson, Karl R Gegenfurtner, Roland W Fleming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takuma MorimotoDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany. takuma.morimoto@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9897-8338
Arash AkbariniaDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-231X
Katherine R StorrsSchool of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9573-8654
Jacob R CheesemanDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9306-537X
Hannah E SmithsonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8904-8315
Karl R GegenfurtnerDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-0684
Roland W FlemingDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-5069

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SFB-TRR-135 222641018Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) SFB-TRR-135, 222641018Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 218657/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key goal of visual neuroscience is to explain how our brains infer object properties such as colour, curvature or gloss. Here we used machine learning to identify computations underlying human gloss judgements-traditionally considered a challenging inference. We rendered thousands of objects with varied shapes using a Ward reflectance model across lighting and viewpoints, then obtained gloss ratings for each image. Observers' judgements were consistent with one another, yet systematically deviated from reality. We compared these ratings with neural networks trained either to estimate physical reflectance ('ground-truth networks') or to reproduce human judgements ('human-like networks'). While estimating physical reflectance required deep networks, shallow networks accurately replicated human judgements. Remarkably, even a single-filter network could predict human judgements better than the best ground-truth network and generalized to known gloss illusions. These results suggest that gloss perception relies on simple general-purpose computations, and demonstrate the power of interpretable 'tiny' networks in understanding cognition.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerVisual PerceptionHumansJudgment

Identifiers

PMID42120903
PMCPMC13388104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.