ArticleScientific reports2026
Digital stethoscope use by non-physician primary care health workers on children under five years of age in rural Bangladesh: a feasibility study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung auscultation is not included in the WHO Integrated Management of Childhood Illness algorithm, partly due to concerns regarding feasibility and reliability when performed by non-physician primary health workers in low-resource settings. In this feasibility study, we evaluated whether non-physician primary care health workers (community health care providers (CHCPs)) can record quality lung sounds from children aged 2-59 months. Feasibility was predefined as more than 50% of children having quality recordings at the overall sample level. After receiving three days of structured training, nine CHCPs recorded lung sounds from four chest positions using a digital stethoscope (Sonavi Labs, United States) in 990 children attending first-level rural clinics in Bangladesh between November 2019 and December 2020, with enrolment paused during the COVID-19 pandemic. A blinded paediatrician listening panel, trained to a standardised interpretation protocol, classified the recordings. A quality recording was defined a priori as the panel classifying three of four chest positions on a participant as interpretable. Lung sounds were recorded from 990 children, and the panel classified 867 children as having a quality recording (87.6%; 95% confidence interval: 85.4%, 89.6%). Among children with quality recordings and available timing data, 89.8% (766/853) were recorded within five minutes. This study demonstrates CHCPs at rural, first-level clinics in Bangladesh are capable of timely, quality recordings of lung sounds from most children using a digital stethoscope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.