ArticleScientific reports2026
MultiScaleKANNet: a hybrid CNN-KAN-transformer architecture for radiographic bone-loss risk stratification from knee X-rays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is underdiagnosed because dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is costly and scarce. We present MultiScaleKANNet, a hybrid deep-learning architecture for radiographic bone-loss risk stratification from routine knee X-rays, combining convolutional feature learning, learnable nonlinear transformations via Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN) layers, and Transformer-based multi-scale attention. We evaluated MultiScaleKANNet on 2,035 knee radiographs from four public Kaggle sources with three categories (Healthy, Osteopenia, Osteoporosis). The labels are proxy labels-some derived from quantitative ultrasound T-scores rather than DXA-so results represent radiographic risk stratification, not clinical diagnosis. On a stratified held-out test set ([Formula: see text]), the model achieved 97.30% accuracy (95% CI: 95.3-98.6%; Cohen's [Formula: see text]; MCC[Formula: see text]; micro-averaged AUC[Formula: see text]). A source-held-out evaluation yielded 89.52% binary accuracy ([Formula: see text]), suggesting in-distribution metrics may partly reflect dataset homogeneity. Ablation studies confirm synergistic gains from KAN layers (+2.46%), multi-scale processing (+4.17%), and Transformer attention (+4.91%), with 40% parameter reduction versus ResNet-18. This is a methodological feasibility study; prospective DXA-confirmed validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.