ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing urbanisation and ecological integrity coupling in Malaysia using interpretable machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urbanisation-environment interactions are increasingly non-linear, yet traditional Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) frameworks often rely on static, linear assumptions that fail to capture complex feedback loops. This study proposes an integrated framework combining CRITIC-weighted CCD assessment with interpretable machine learning (Random Forest and XGBoost) to decode the co-evolution of urbanisation and ecological integrity. Taking Malaysia, a country characterised by rapid expansion and high spatial disparity-as a critical case study, we utilized multi-source remote sensing and longitudinal statistics across 16 states. Our XGBoost model (Test R² ≈ 0.87) outperformed traditional regressions, confirming significant non-linear and dynamic coupling effects. By applying SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations), we moved beyond mere prediction to identify the sustainability "tipping points" within the system. Key findings reveal: (1) a distinct spatial decoupling in northern and east-coast regions; (2) a "hump-shaped" threshold effect for built-up expansion where coordination peaks before declining; and (3) the critical role of forest/water assets as non-linear ecological buffers. These results demonstrate that sustainable transitions depend more on spatial structure and asset management than on income growth alone. This interpretable AI-CCD framework provides a scalable, evidence-based toolkit for low- and middle-income countries to navigate the trade-offs between development and ecological preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.