ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Robust Bayesian multilevel meta-analysis: Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of dependent effect sizes.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Work-focused cognitive behavioural therapy for common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychology · 2026Pooled it
- No evidence that nonincentivized behavioral interventions effectively mitigate climate change after adjusting for publication bias.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- The Feasibility of Combining Cost-Effectiveness, Bayesian Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Techniques When Evaluating Melanoma Treatment Methods.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meta-analyses often include multiple dependent effect sizes, yet current methods typically neglect the resulting within-study dependencies or fail to address model uncertainty and publication bias adequately. We extend robust Bayesian meta-analysis (RoBMA) to a multilevel framework, simultaneously handling within-study dependencies, model uncertainty, heterogeneity, moderators, and publication bias. Specifically, the three-level RoBMA integrates approximate Bayesian selection models with PET-PEESE adjustments within a hierarchical Bayesian setting. We illustrate the methodology through empirical examples and demonstrate its performance via simulations. The approach is implemented in the RoBMA R package and JASP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.