ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
The Impact of Government-Funded Brief Psychological Interventions on Mental Health: A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Italian "Psychological Bonus" Policy.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic amplified an ongoing mental health crisis in Europe. In response, the Italian Ministry of Health introduced the "Psychological Bonus," a government-funded initiative aimed at improving access to brief psychological interventions (BPIs). This longitudinal study examined the effectiveness of these publicly funded BPIs in reducing psychological distress, anxiety, and depression among a large sample of Italian patients, while also exploring the moderating roles of therapy continuation, therapist orientation, and treatment setting. A total of 1,541 participants were assessed at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1), and six-month follow-up (T2) using the CORE-10, GAD-7, and PHQ-9. Longitudinal trajectories were analyzed using Linear Mixed Models, controlling for age, sex, and session count. Separate models examined the impact of therapy continuation, therapist orientation, and treatment setting (in-person, online, or blended). Significant reductions in psychological distress, depression, and anxiety from baseline to post-treatment were maintained at follow-up, with effect sizes ranging from medium to large across outcomes and timepoints (d = 0.54-0.80). A small but significant attenuation of psychological distress gains was observed between post-treatment and follow-up, while depression and anxiety scores remained stable. Continuation of therapy after the funded sessions did not significantly moderate symptom trajectories. Likewise, no significant differences in change trajectories emerged across therapist theoretical orientations or treatment settings. The findings provide strong support for the effectiveness of the "Psychological Bonus" as a publicly funded BPI, helpful in addressing widespread mental health needs across different therapeutic and delivery models, representing a promising model for mental health policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42120772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.