Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42120757›Full record

ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2026

Advancement flaps in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: technical steps and current evidence.

U Aho Fält, P Myrelid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

U Aho FältSurgery Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. ursula.aho_falt@med.lu.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6960-7490
P MyrelidDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7518-9213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease is complex and negatively affects quality of life. Rectal advancement flap (AF) has been widely adopted as a sphincter-preserving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. The European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) guidelines on surgical treatment of Crohn's disease state that AF is a therapeutic option for patients with Crohn's disease and complex perianal fistulas. Despite its use in clinical practice, documented use of AF in treating fistulas related to Crohn's disease remains limited. This narrative review aimed to examine the latest literature and discuss current evidence for the surgical treatment of fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease using AF procedures. A PICO search was conducted in the electronic databases PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar to identify studies published in English on the topic between 2018 and November 2025. In total, 11 studies were identified, including 305 patients with Crohn's disease. Most patients received a draining loose seton prior to the AF procedure, while the proportion of patients on biological therapy or with a diverting stoma varied greatly. Reported success rates for clinical healing ranged from 23% to 91%, with median follow-up times reported between 7 months and 6 years (total range: 2 months to 10 years). Despite the inherent limitations of mostly retrospective and small studies, the available evidence supports the feasibility of AFs in fistulizing perianal Crohn's disease, provided there is adequate fistula drainage and, importantly, optimized biological therapy to minimize luminal and perianal inflammation.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseRectal FistulaSurgical FlapsAnal CanalColorectal Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAdvancement flapAnal fistulaCrohn’s diseaseRectovaginal fistulaSurgery

Identifiers

PMID42120757
PMCPMC13167883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.