ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Fundamental limitations of kilohertz-frequency carriers in afferent fibre recruitment with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcutaneous spinal stimulation with upper extremity robotic training in chronic stroke and spinal cord injury: individual neurophysiological and clinical responses.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Neural mechanisms underlying leg muscle responses during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- Fundamental limitations of kilohertz-frequency carriers in afferent fibre recruitment with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Transient effects in corticospinal and reticulospinal tract excitability induced by motor skill and isometric resistance training.Brain research · 2026Article
- Virtual prototyping of non-invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation targeting upper limb motor function.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Short-term effect of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized sham-controlled crossover study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Kilohertz-frequency (KHF) waveforms are gaining traction in transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) for motor recovery after paralysis. However, the mechanisms by which these fast-alternating currents depolarize proprioceptive afferent and motor efferent fibres remain unknown. To address this gap, we conducted a study in 28 participants showing, through peripheral nerve stimulation experiments and computational modelling, that KHF waveforms negatively impact the processes required to electrically induce action potentials, thereby increasing response thresholds and biasing recruitment towards motor efferent fibres. While these results translate to tSCS, we also demonstrate that lumbar tSCS still results in the preferential recruitment of proprioceptive afferent fibres, whereas cervical tSCS favours recruitment of motor efferent fibres, regardless of the waveform used. Given the assumed importance of proprioceptive afferent stimulation in motor recovery, our work suggests that the use of KHF waveforms warrants careful consideration in the context of neurorehabilitation applications, particularly for cervical tSCS. We posit that a thorough analysis of the mechanisms mediating responses elicited by novel tSCS approaches is crucial for understanding their potential to restore motor function after paralysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.