Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42120719›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Metabolic, demographic, and behavioral risk factors predict brain structural variability in the general population: an analysis of the human connectome project young adults.

Yunus Soleymani, Kazem Khalagi, Sina Negarandeh, Nima Negarandeh, Seyed Amir Hossein Batouli, Ata Pourabbasi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yunus SoleymaniDepartment of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-5105
Kazem KhalagiOsteoporosis Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0890-6232
Sina NegarandehFaculty of Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7508-8629
Nima NegarandehDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9186-3156
Seyed Amir Hossein BatouliDepartment of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. batouli@sina.tums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9157-4522
Ata PourabbasiDepartment of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. atapoura@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9500-640X

Funding

Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services 67587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding whether commonly available metabolic, demographic, and behavioral factors can explain variability in brain structure may support the development of accessible predictive approaches. This study aims to evaluate the ability of machine learning regression models to predict brain structural measures in young, neurologically healthy adults using clinically accessible risk factors.

methodsData were drawn from the Human Connectome Project Young Adults dataset, including 1082 participants aged 22-37. Predictors comprised metabolic measures (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, hematocrit, body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, thyroid stimulating hormone) and demographic/behavioral variables (age, gender, race, education level, smoking history, alcohol use). Brain structural parameters from MRI included gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes, surface areas, and cortical thickness. Distance correlation (dcor) guided feature selection, followed by machine learning modeling. Model performance was evaluated using normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), normalized root-mean-squared error (NRMSE), and coefficient of determination (R²). SHAP values were used for feature interpretation.

resultsXGBoost consistently outperformed other algorithms, showing strong predictive accuracy for total brain segmentation, supratentorial, and total GM volumes (NMAE < 0.35, R² > 0.80). In contrast, cortical surface predictions (left superior frontal) showed moderate performance (NMAE > 0.50, R² < 0.60). SHAP analysis highlighted age, gender, education level, and diastolic and systolic blood pressure as the most influential predictors of brain structure.

conclusionsThe findings highlight the methodological value of regression-based approaches for estimating brain structural variability and support their potential role as complementary tools for brain health research.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeAdultBlood PressureBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleGray MatterHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePredictive Learning ModelsRisk FactorsWhite MatterYoung AdultBrain structureDemographic predictorsMachine learningMetabolic risk factorsPopulation brain health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.