ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Multi-center pressure reactivity index temporal trajectories for predicting outcome in comatose subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure reactivity index (PRx) is a surrogate for cerebral autoregulation and has been used for prognostication in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We examined patient-specific temporal courses of PRx and identified time thresholds that optimized the accuracy of PRx monitoring. Comatose patients with SAH from two Comprehensive Stroke Centers were identified and received continuous ICP and PRx recordings. Outcomes were dichotomized into "poor" versus "good" based on disposition and modified Rankin score. Smoothed PRx trajectories were created to generate "candidate features", looking at daily average PRx and cumulative first-order and second-order changes in PRx. "Candidate features" were used to perform penalized logistic regression analysis. Penalized logistic regression models that maximized specificity for poor outcome were iteratively generated and evaluated sensitivity changes over time. We evaluated 33 comatose SAH patients in this cohort. Average PRx trajectories for good and poor outcome groups diverged at post-ictus day 6. When targeting specificities ≥ 78.6% for poor outcome, sensitivities for predicting poor outcome maximized to 70% (± 7%) at post-ictus day 8 and remained between 55% and 65% for the remainder of the monitoring period up to day 23. Area under curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curves consistently demonstrated AUC-ROC > 0.71 after post-ictus day 8 (maximum AUC-ROC 0.78 at day 8). We found that when using PRx time-thresholds for predicting poor outcome in comatose SAH patients, prognostication with PRx was maximized at post-ictus day 8. Longer PRx monitoring did not improve predictive power. Further study is required to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42120701What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.