ArticleScientific reports2026
Spatiotemporal skeleton based learning for automatic exercise quality assessment and real time posture correction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHome-based fitness training requires automated systems for exercise quality assessment and real-time posture correction without professional supervision. PURPOSE: We develop an AI-powered virtual fitness system using spatiotemporal skeleton analysis for automatic exercise quality assessment.
methodsWe propose Anatomical-Prior Sparse Attention (APSA), integrating biomechanical constraints into graph neural networks. APSA hierarchically models spatial and temporal dependencies through anatomically-informed attention, focusing on kinematically meaningful joint interactions while pruning implausible connections. The system processes 3D skeletal keypoints from standard RGB cameras.
resultsEvaluation on two public datasets (IntelliRehabDS and Kimore) shows APSA achieves 76.9% accuracy in quality classification and 0.789 F1-score in error detection, outperforming recent 2024 methods by 1.1-8.5 percentage points while maintaining real-time performance (8.2 ms per sequence). The system identifies common errors including knee valgus (84.3% accuracy) and excessive trunk lean.
conclusionsThe biomechanically-informed attention mechanism enhances accuracy and interpretability, enabling scalable deployment in home-based training and remote rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.