ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing randomized controlled trials through smartwatch-guided participant matching for infectious disease outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aim to maximize statistical power while minimizing cost and recruitment burden. In practice, randomization is often stratified or restricted using demographic variables such as age and sex, while physiological heterogeneity that may influence treatment response is rarely incorporated. Consumer smartwatches are now widely used and provide continuous, real-world measurements of cardiovascular physiology and daily activity patterns, including resting heart rate, heart rate variability, sleep timing and regularity, and physical activity, capturing stable individual-level characteristics outside clinical settings. Leveraging these data, we developed Smartwatch-Informed Matching (SIM), a pre-randomization framework that groups physiologically similar participants and applies constrained randomization to assign participants to intervention and control arms. Using a prospective cohort of 4,795 individuals, we compared SIM with conventional age- and sex-based stratification. SIM improved covariate balance and increased similarity in symptom severity (Spearman ρ = 0.176 vs. 0.012) and physiological response profiles (Pearson r = 0.245 vs. 0.112). Power analyses showed that SIM reduced the sample size required to maintain statistical power by 9-18% across a range of effect sizes. These findings demonstrate that incorporating smartwatch-derived physiological similarity into pre-randomization design can enhance the efficiency and precision of randomized clinical trials. The SIM framework is also readily applicable to retrospective matched analyses that aim to reduce confounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.