ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance and generalization analysis of machine learning, deep learning, and transformer models for histopathology image classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histopathology image classification plays a critical role in computer-aided diagnosis by supporting pathologists in disease detection and grading. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, a wide range of machine learning, deep learning, and transformer-based models have been applied to histopathological image analysis. However, a systematic and fair comparison of these approaches under a unified experimental setting remains limited. In this study, we present a comprehensive performance and generalization analysis of classical machine learning classifiers, convolutional neural network (CNN) models, and vision transformer-based architectures for histopathology image classification. Publicly available benchmark datasets were used to evaluate the models using standardized preprocessing, training protocols, and evaluation metrics. The comparative analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each category of methods in terms of classification accuracy, robustness, and computational complexity. Experimental results demonstrate that deep learning and transformer-based models consistently outperform traditional machine learning approaches, while transformer models show improved generalization capability on complex tissue patterns. The findings of this study provide practical insights for selecting suitable classification models in histopathology-based diagnostic applications and contribute to the development of reliable medical imaging decision-support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.