ArticleScientific reports2026
NerveAI- a machine learning algorithm for detection of nerve pain in the head and neck.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nerve pain screening in patients with headache disorders requires specialized clinical knowledge that is frequently not readily accessible at the initial point-of-care. This results in restricted access to early treatment, thereby increasing the risk of chronic pain refractory to therapy and predisposing patients to long-term disability and narcotic dependence. Therefore, there is a need for a simple screening tool that enables timely and accurate diagnosis of nerve pain. Here, we present the development of NerveAI, a 3D head and neck model that allows for an Artificial Intelligence-driven pattern recognition of nerve pain. The algorithm was trained using 1,299 head and neck pain drawings based on anatomic nerve paths and radiation patterns. Input features were constructed with coordinates of the pain drawings. The best performing model to detect nerve pain was the multilayer perceptron model (AUROC:0.879 ± 0.044)). When identifying specific nerve pain types, the model demonstrated high AUROC values of 0.928(± 0.025), 0.930(± 0.017), 0.884(± 0.031), and 0.954(± 0.025) for occipital, frontal, temporal, and trigeminal neuralgia, respectively. Our findings demonstrate NerveAI's potential to enable broader screening by non-specialized providers, allowing for early diagnosis and treatment to improve patient outcomes regardless of geographic, socioeconomic, or healthcare literacy barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.