ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2026
Salicylic Acid as a Modulator of Insect Interactions in Tomato Crops.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Salicylic acid (SA) is a key regulator of plant defense signaling and is widely used as a plant defense inducer in crop protection. However, its effects on insect host-selection behavior and plant chemical signaling remain incompletely understood. Here, we evaluated how exogenous SA application affects tomato-insect interactions by examining behavioral responses of two major pests, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), together with changes in plant volatile emissions. Tomato plants were sprayed with SA and tested in preference bioassays and Y-tube olfactometer assays, while volatile profiles were analyzed by GC-MS. SA treatment significantly altered the volatile profile of tomato plants and increased the attraction of both insect species in olfactometer assays. However, these responses did not translate into consistent host acceptance: T. absoluta females tended to lay more eggs on SA-treated plants, whereas T. vaporariorum adults tended to settle on untreated plants. Several volatiles that changed after SA application, including 1-octen-3-ol, γ-terpinene, (E)-caryophyllene and α-humulene, have previously been reported to be detected by T. absoluta antennae and may contribute to host-location cues. Together, these findings indicate that SA-induced changes in tomato volatile emissions can modify herbivore attraction, but subsequent host acceptance responses depend on species-specific behavioral mechanisms. These results highlight the complexity of plant defense induction and its potential consequences for pest management strategies. Specifically, our findings suggest that while SA application may contribute to reducing whitefly settlement, it could simultaneously increase the susceptibility of tomato plants to T. absoluta infestation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42120641What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.