ArticleScientific reports2026
A federated learning-benchmarking framework for privacy-preserving UAV intrusion detection using adaptive aggregation algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent explosive growth of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has contributed to their high vulnerability to cyber-attacks including Denial of Service (DoS), identity impersonation and unauthorized access to data. The UAV networks have the inherent risks of centralized Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) which pose critical privacy risks and points of failure, and therefore the decentralized and privacy-preserving learning paradigms are required. The paper presents federated learning architecture called FedDrone-Shield( Federated Learning Framework for Drone Security and Shield against Intrusions), which is used in the task of detecting UAV intrusions in the scenarios of Independent and Identically Distributed (IID) data and the assessment of several aggregation algorithms: FedAvg, FedProx, FedAdam, FedMedian, and ClusterAvg. A significant amount of experiments that were carried out on a dataset on anomaly detection of UAVs prove that FedAdam and ClusterAvg outperform other aggregation strategies by achieving test accuracies of 99.98, F1-scores of 0.9999, and impressively low loss values of 0.0009-0.0014. FedMedian has also closely competitive performance, whereas FedAvg and FedProx are slightly less accurate and slower converging. Client-level assessments also show a consistent high precision, recall and F1-score across all attack types, with weighted F1-scores between 0.9997 and 0.9999, which again shows that there is reliable detection performance amongst distributed UAV clients. These findings make FedDrone-Shield a strong and feasible bench-marking model of federated intrusion detection in UAV networks proving that adaptive aggregation approaches contribute to a substantial improvement of detection accuracy, training, and data privacy. This means that the proposed structure offers a robust basis of intrusion detection that is safe and ensures privacy in distributed UAVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.