ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
EMQN Best Practice Guidelines for Genetic Testing and Reporting in RYR1-related disorders.
Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reply to: residual risk after familial RYR1 testing: interpreting malignant hyperthermia susceptibility in the context of regional testing strategies.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, we present EMQN Best Practice Guidelines for Genetic Testing and Reporting in RYR1-related disorders. They aim is to aid clinical genetic laboratories in testing, and unequivocal and comprehensive reporting of RYR1 variants for the benefit of patients and their relatives. These guidelines are supported by experts in the field of anaesthesia, (paediatric) neurology, clinical genetics and clinical laboratory genetics. The ryanodine receptor type 1 is a large calcium channel that regulates calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum resulting in muscle contraction. This receptor is encoded by the RYR1 gene and expressed predominantly in skeletal muscle. Pathogenic RYR1 variants are associated with several allelic disorders: malignant hyperthermia, a hypermetabolic reaction to certain anaesthetics in otherwise healthy individuals, exertional rhabdomyolysis and both autosomal dominant and recessive congenital myopathies. In general, RYR1 gain-of-function variants are associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, whereas dominant-negative and loss-of-function variants are associated with dominant and recessive myopathies, respectively. However, a small subset of RYR1 variants is associated with a combination of dominant malignant hyperthermia susceptibility with either a dominant or a recessive myopathy or exertional rhabdomyolysis. The apparent discrepancy between molecular mechanisms and different phenotypes is currently poorly understood. As a consequence, the context-dependent interpretation of RYR1 variants is challenging in diagnostic genetic testing. In particular, it is not trivial to assign a possible associated risk for an allelic disorder for an individual or their relatives, which is especially relevant in family planning.
Identifiers
42120542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.