Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42120538›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A minimal-net CNN model for an IoT-based brain tumor detection and monitoring system.

Md Taimur Ahad, Bo Song, Yan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Md Taimur AhadSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia. MdTaimur.Ahad@unisq.edu.au.
Bo SongSchool of Engineering, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Yan LiSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we propose M-Net, a lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (L-CNN) designed for real-time brain tumor classification and detection. Large, state-of-the-art (SOTA) CNN models often face deployment challenges on edge devices due to their high computational resource requirements. To address this, M-Net utilizes a sequential architecture with 4 × 4 kernels and progressive filter expansion, balancing computational efficiency and classification performance. The model was trained and tested on three diverse MRI datasets (3-class, 4-class, and 15-class) to evaluate its robustness and generalizability across varying brain tumor modalities. In k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) and on an unseen test set, M-Net achieved an average accuracy of 99%, outperforming SOTA CNNs (96%). The study also integrates explainable AI techniques-LIME, SHAP, and Grad-CAM-to visualize regions of MRI images contributing to the model's decision-making process. Additionally, a web and mobile application for smart brain tumor management (SBTM) was developed using M-Net, demonstrating real-time processing at 1 FPS, minimal thermal consumption, and low energy usage. The novel contributions of M-Net lie in its efficient architecture and integration with XAI, making it a suitable candidate for clinical deployment in brain tumor diagnosis. With only 495,972 parameters, M-Net offers a practical, deployable solution for real-time tumor classification on edge devices.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsInternet of ThingsNeural Networks, ComputerConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain tumor detectionCNNConvolutional neural networkGRAD-CAMLightweight CNNLIMESHAP

Identifiers

PMID42120538
PMCPMC13358162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.