ArticleScientific reports2026
Cross-cancer homologous recombination deficiency prediction from whole slide images using transfer learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) is vital for personalized cancer therapy, yet genomic assays are often costly and complex. Predicting HRD from Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained whole-slide images (WSIs) via deep learning offers an alternative, but model generalization across diverse cancer types remains challenging. We developed a three-stage transfer learning framework to improve HRD prediction across cancer types. After establishing baseline models on data from eight cancer types, the TCGA-BRCA model was selected as a pretrained model for transfer learning applied to eligible cohorts. Transfer learning enhanced HRD prediction performance specifically in cancers with histological similarity to the TCGA-BRCA source model. The AUC increased by + 4% (TCGA-LUAD), + 5% (CPTAC-LUAD), and + 1% (SARC) compared to baseline models. Interpretability analysis confirmed that the model's predictions were driven by histologically relevant tumor regions, which was further supported by quantitative cellular analysis showing that HRD-high status was characterized by a significantly higher density of neoplastic cells (HRD-high: median 16.0, IQR 1.0-27.0 vs. HRD-low: median 1.0, IQR:0.0-5.0; p < 0.001), whereas HRD-low cases featured a stromal-rich microenvironment. Conclusions This study demonstrates that transfer learning can enhance HRD prediction from H&E images for cancer types sharing histopathological features with the TCGA-BRCA source model, offering a more efficient and accessible approach for clinical HRD assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.