ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning approaches to dietary classification from dental microtexture in primates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental microwear texture (DMT) analysis is a critical proxy for reconstructing the diets of extant and extinct mammals. While craniodental morphology reflects selective pressures across evolutionary timescales, microwear captures localized, short-term dietary signals over weeks to months. However, the high dimensionality of modern 3D surface microtexture data, often spanning disparate parameter sets (such as ISO standards and scale-sensitive fractal analysis, SSFA), complicates classification, particularly when working with limited paleontological datasets. To address this, we present a robust machine learning pipeline designed to automatically classify primate samples ([Formula: see text]) across 6 dietary groups and 7 species. Our methodology leverages a nested leave-one-out cross-validation framework to evaluate multiple classifiers, including multinomial logistic regression (MLR) with various regularization approaches, Naive Bayes, and tree-based ensemble algorithms (e.g., Random forests, XGBoost). Our results demonstrate that Lasso-regularized MLR and Naive Bayes yield the highest predictive performance while enforcing strict feature selection to maintain interpretability. Crucially, models relying exclusively on ISO parameters consistently outperformed those using SSFA, as ISO variables better capture the microroughness localized mechanical abrasions generated by specific diets in our dataset. Furthermore, the integration of novel Fourier-based descriptors and isotropy variables significantly enhanced models' discriminating power. By providing a mathematically rigorous framework to isolate precise ecological signals from noisy, high-dimensional data, this approach enables more accurate and reproducible dietary classifications. Ultimately, refining these dietary reconstructions is essential for resolving broader questions regarding niche partitioning, species evolution, and paleoecological dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.