ArticleScientific reports2026
Weed detection in blackgram fields under occlusion and class imbalance using SA-ANMS Faster R-CNN.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sustainable agriculture has been greatly challenged by the problems of dense canopies that result in extreme occlusion, scale disparities and imbalances of classes, making it difficult to detect small and overlapping weeds in real field conditions. Actual blackgram fields in Karnataka, India, were used to generate a dataset that featured a high level of crop to weed contest, and exhibited a significant amount of scale diversity, with 75 percent of objects comprising less than 0.8 percent of the image space. To address these challenges, the paper presents a better Faster R-CNN framework that adds five modules, i.e. Spatial Attention (SA), Multi-Scale Fusion (MSF), Context-Aware RoI, Shape-Aware Prediction and Adaptive Non-Maximum Suppression (ANMS). The research shows that with larger architectural complexity, there is no guarantee of better performance through an extensive ablation study involving 32 model configurations. The best two-module combination (SA + ANMS) obtained the highest F1 -score of 0.9547, precision of 0.9439, recall of 0.9658, and a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 0.9445, and inference speed of 4.42 FPS, which was higher than the full five-module version. It is important to note that only 12.5% of configurations were better than the baseline, highlighting the fact that too much module stacking may hurt performance. The analysis shows that there is a high positive synergy between SA and ANMS and that the MSF module competes slightly on features. The novelty of this work lies in the systematic exploration of how various enhancement modules can be interacted to function as a single detection framework and show that the selective combination of modules can produce a better outcome than random stacking. Especially, the finding of a complementarity, optimum minimum combination of SA + ANMS confirms that the efficiency-based design is used, not complexity-based expansion. It provides informative insight on designing efficient detection system for precision agriculture applications by revealing the impact of wise module selection instead of architecture complexity on obtaining consistent weed detection against occlusion and inter-class inconsistencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.