ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative analysis of bypass vs. stent for coronary revascularization using an ex-vivo organ care system in an animal model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many patients with coronary artery disease are eligible for either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Technical and clinical aspects influence the decision for either treatment. However, biological effects of PCI and CABG on long-term coronary artery anatomy and physiology should be considered but are largely unknown. Eight German landrace swine were used in this study. An artificial atherosclerotic plaque (AAP) was implanted into the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) to simulate coronary atherosclerosis. Physiological changes of PCI and surgical CABG in vascular and perivascular tissue were assessed in an ex vivo setting (organ care system OCS). Furthermore, radiological and nuclear imaging was performed using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT). Furthermore, interventional (PCI) and surgical (CABG) treatment was evaluated using an ex-vivo setting. Lymphatic flow and myocardial perfusion were improved in pigs in the CABG group compared to the PCI group. The PCI group showed a significantly higher mean count number proximal to the intervention in the LAD area. Stenting experiments showed a significantly higher mean count number proximal to the intervention in the LAD area. This effect could also be demonstrated macroscopically, as myocardial infarct areas were smaller and myocardial function was better after defibrillation in the OCS (organ care system) in the CABG treated hearts. The artificial atherosclerotic plaque model in porcine hearts is a new valuable tool to simulate coronary artery stenosis without damaging other organs. It may serve as a tool for future medical testing and for further specific research on coronary artery physiology. Our data suggest that the cardiac lymphatic vascular system and perfusion capability are partly restricted after PCI as compared to CABG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.