ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Exploring the utility of artificial intelligence in identifying progression of prostate cancer during active surveillance: A systematic review.
Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Standardizing serial prostate MRI in active surveillance: a practical review of PRECISE scoring.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a recent surge in interest in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in prostate cancer (PCa). When evaluating PSMA PET scans, AI has shown promise in detecting intraprostatic cancer and metastatic disease. This systematic review aims to assess the ability of AI to detect or predict the progression of PCa during AS.
methodsThis systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (ID CRD42024529354) and conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. Only studies evaluating AI in AS-eligible patients were included.
resultsAfter screening 842 articles, 12 studies were suitable for inclusion. The included studies comprised of 4622 AS patients of whom 1022 experienced progressions. Only three studies utilised developed their AI purely on clinicopathological variables. The area under curve (AUC) of these three AI ranged between 0.65 and 0.76, and the AI algorithm in one study outperformed traditional logistic regression. The integration of MRI parameters particularly the use of radiomics improves the ability of AI to predict progression as compared to clinicopathological variables alone. AI was also able to analyse serial MRI during AS and performs on par with the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system. The AUC of the AI algorithms which included MRI parameters ranged between 0.65 and 0.95. One of the limitations was the variability in study methodologies and inclusion criteria. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used and none of the studies had high risk of bias.
conclusionAI shows promise in detecting PCa progression during AS. However, this systematic review highlights the need for larger prospective studies with external validation before AI can be integrated into the AS process.
Identifiers
42120496What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.