ArticleScientific reports2026
Role of artificial intelligence in analyzing human behavior and predicting personality traits and personality disorders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional approaches to the diagnosis of personality disorders, including a clinical interview and a self-report, are usually limited by subjectivity and time constraints. Recent developments in artificial intelligence have opened the possibility of more objective and data-driven psychological testing. This paper introduces an AI-powered system that forecasts personality disorders using natural language processing (NLP), speech recognition, and face recognition. The suggested method should help with the initial diagnosis and more tailored mental health solutions. Two benchmark datasets were used: myPersonality for text analysis and DAIC-WOZ for multimodal analysis of speech and facial expressions. The feature extraction methods were TF-IDF, Vader sentiment scores, Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients, prosodic features, facial action units, and gaze tracking. BiLSTM, CNN, BERT, and GPT-3 models were analyzed through accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and AUC-ROC. GPT-3 was the most accurate at 89.1%, followed by BERT at 87.4% and CNN-based facial analysis at 85.6%. The findings indicate that multimodal fusion improves classification by leveraging holistic and complementary behavioral information. These results support the promise of multimodal systems with AI capabilities to make more precise predictions of personality disorders and underscore the need to consider interpretability, fairness, and data privacy in future applications. It should be mentioned that the current study deals with the problem of both normal personality traits prediction (through the Big Five framework) and features that can reflect psychological distress and be related to personality disorders. The myPersonality data set measures normative personality dimensions, whereas the DAIC-WOZ data set measures multimodal behavioral data that is relevant in clinical terms. The paper explains the connections between extreme trait profiles and clinical personality disorders to reconcile the paradigms of trait and disorder assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.