Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42120433›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Efficient deep learning models for oral squamous cell carcinoma classification in histopathological images.

Jatender Kumar, Munish Kumar, M K Jindal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jatender KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Application, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Munish KumarDepartment of Computational Sciences, Maharaja Ranjit Singh Punjab Technical University, Bathinda, Punjab, India. munishcse@gmail.com.
M K JindalDepartment of Computer Science and Applications, Panjab University Regional Centre, Muktsar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in deep learning have significantly improved the accuracy and efficiency of disease classification in digital pathology. Early diagnosis and precise classification of histopathological images are crucial for enabling timely treatment and improving therapeutic outcomes. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most common malignancies in the oral cavity, with manual histopathological examination serving as the gold standard for diagnosis-though it is time-consuming and subject to observer variability. This study investigates the performance of four deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) models-ResNet50 (residual blocks), DenseNet201 (dense connectivity), EfficientNetB0 (compound scaling), and ConvNeXt_Tiny (transformer-based convolutions)-for binary classification (benign vs. carcinoma) of 10,000 histopathological images. Among the models, EfficientNetB0 achieved the highest accuracy of 97.6% and an ROC-AUC score of 0.9963, demonstrating superior generalization and discriminative power. ConvNeXt_Tiny followed with an accuracy of 95.92%, DenseNet201 with 86.08%, and ResNet50 with the lowest accuracy of 71.52%. The comparative analysis underscores the advantages of modern CNN architectures over traditional residual networks, supporting the integration of deep learning models into diagnostic frameworks for improved detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellDeep LearningMouth NeoplasmsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedROC CurveDeep learningHistopathologyImage classificationOSCC

Identifiers

PMID42120433
PMCPMC13357576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.