ArticleNature communications2026
Artificial intelligence for predicting hospital admissions from the emergency department: a prospective, quasi-experimental study.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05683899 (Evaluation of Emergency Department AI Prediction Algorithm), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Emergency Department AI Prediction Algorithm
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of certain artificial intelligence (AI) tools may improve hospital operational efficiency, in particular in overcrowded emergency departments (ED). Here, we conduct a prospective, quasi experimental study evaluating an AI model predicting hospital admission risk, alternately displaying and hiding its outputs to clinicians in 2 week blocks over 11 months in 2023. Among 54,394 eligible ED visits, the AI tool does not change the number of ED patients discharged per day but reduces median ED length of stay by 12 min without increasing 72 h bounceback visits. Model performance remained stable (AUC 0.80-0.82), and hospitalist clinicians reported greater perceived usefulness than ED clinicians. These findings show that integrating a low burden AI prediction tool into ED workflows can improve operational efficiency. The study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05683899).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.