Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42120316›Full record

ArticleHeadache

Efficacy of a multidisciplinary 5-day headache day-clinic program: A prospective quasi-experimental pre-post study in primary headache disorders.

Nadja Fiebig, Luise Bartsch, Christine Klötzer, Josephine Gewand, Johanna Ruhnau, Sebastian Strauß, Uwe Reuter, Robert Fleischmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nadja FiebigDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Luise BartschDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Christine KlötzerDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Josephine GewandDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Johanna RuhnauDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Sebastian StraußDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Uwe ReuterUniversity Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Robert FleischmannDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8159-2658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of a short, structured multimodal day-clinic program on health-related quality of life and disability in patients with primary headache disorders.

backgroundAlthough monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway have substantially advanced migraine prophylaxis, a large proportion of patients remain insufficiently controlled. Residual disability, comorbidities, and contraindications highlight the need for complementary nonpharmacological approaches. Multimodal programs combining medical, psychological, and behavioral strategies have proven effective in chronic pain but remain insufficiently studied in primary headache populations, particularly in the context of modern pharmacological options.

methodsIn this quasi-experimental pre-post study at the neurological day clinic of University of Greifswald, we investigated a 5-day multimodal treatment program delivered by an interdisciplinary team. Patients were recruited between January and July 2021. The intervention comprised medical consultations, psychological therapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, structured education, and relaxation training. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed with the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12; primary end points: mental component summary [MCS] and physical component summary [PCS]), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and headache diaries. Assessments were performed during the pre-admission waiting period (V0), at admission (V1), and at 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment (V2-V4). Primary analyses focused on changes from baseline to 3 months, with exploratory analyses for extended follow-up.

resultsA total of 92 patients were included, most with migraine (83%). The VR-12 MCS improved significantly over time (F[2,162] = 3.23, p = 0.042; nominal), increasing from an estimated marginal mean of 36.9 (95% CI, 33.35-40.45) at baseline (V0) to 38.3 (95% CI, 35.54-41.06) at V1, and 41.5 (95% CI, 37.55-45.45) at 3 months (V2). Focusing on the pre-specified baseline-to-3-month contrast, MCS improved from V0 to V2 (mean difference, 4.63; 95% CI, 1.02-8.24; p = 0.012; Holm-Bonferroni p

conclusionA short, structured multimodal program in a day-clinic setting significantly improved the mental component of health-related quality of life and reduced headache-related disability in patients with primary headache disorders. Although physical functioning and headache frequency did not change significantly at 3 months, the program provided clinically relevant benefits in coping and mental health. These findings highlight multimodal day-clinic treatment as a valuable component of comprehensive headache care, even in the era of CGRP-targeted treatment options.

Indexed as

Headache Disorders, PrimaryAdultCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomemigrainemultimodal therapynonpharmacological interventionprimary headache disordersquality of life

Identifiers

PMID42120316
PMCPMC13327035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.