ArticleBrain tumor research and treatment2026
Article in Brain tumor research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPosterior fossa group A (PFA) ependymoma is a lethal pediatric brain tumor driven predominantly by epigenetic dysregulation. Enhancer of Zeste Homologs Inhibitory Protein (EZHIP) is a defining oncogenic factor in PFA ependymoma that inhibits PRC2 activity, inducing a global loss of H3K27me3 and sustaining aberrant developmental transcriptional programs. Although the metabolic modulator, metformin, reduces EZHIP protein levels, the mechanisms governing EZHIP regulation remain undefined.
methodsWe generated a stable HEK293T reporter cell expressing HA- and RFP-tagged EZHIP together with a GFP viability control, enabling quantitative and viability-normalized assessment of EZHIP abundance.
resultsComputational analyses identified multiple high-confidence serine phosphorylation sites on EZHIP and implicated AMPK, MAPK, PKC, AKT, and CK2 signaling pathways. High-throughput screening revealed that activation of the AMPK axis robustly suppressed EZHIP protein levels. Secondary validation demonstrated that biguanides activating AMPK reduced EZHIP abundance independently of cytotoxicity and restored global H3K27me3 levels. In contrast, PKC activation increased EZHIP protein abundance.
conclusionOur study identifies EZHIP as a dynamically regulated oncoprotein controlled by post-translational signaling pathways. AMPK and PKC exert opposing effects on EZHIP stability, defining actionable regulatory mechanisms for therapeutic targeting in EZHIP-driven cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.