ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2026
Patient-centered online health information on diverticulitis: Assessing the readability, content, and overall quality.
Article in American journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study assessed the quality, content, and readability of patient-centered online health information about diverticulitis.
methodsFive common diverticulitis-related terms were searched on Google. The first 50 websites for each term were reviewed. Popularity, quality, core content, and readability were evaluated using Google Trends, the DISCERN instrument, core content domains based on American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons patient education, and an online readability calculator.
resultsOf 250 search results, 176 met inclusion criteria, yielding 98 unique websites. The median total DISCERN score was 48.5 ("fair"), and only 5.1% of websites were rated excellent. 73.5% exceeded the recommended eighth-grade reading level. More than 85% lacked information on recurrence risk or emerging research, and approximately 40% failed to describe diagnostic testing.
conclusionsOnline health information on diverticulitis demonstrates considerable variability in content, quality and readability. To better support patient-centered care and informed decision-making, the development of accessible, high-quality online resources should be prioritized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.