ArticleeNeuro2026
Neural Mechanisms of Self-Generated Action Sequences.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex problems often allow multiple paths to a solution. Choosing and taking the best path is an important part of the executive cognition that underpins intelligent problem-solving behavior. However, once a path is chosen, the motor system must be activated for executing it. This interface between problem-solving and self-generated action has rarely been studied. We recorded EEG movement-related potentials while 25 participants (7 males, 18 females) performed the "Tower of London" problem-solving task. In a control condition, participants merely followed instructed steps without planning for any goal and thus without any sense that their movements solved a problem. Readiness potentials (RPs) preceding actions showed a more sustained preparatory negativity for self-generated than stimulus-driven movements. Critically, this effect was most pronounced at the first move of a sequence and diminished at later stages, indicating that preparatory activity is closely linked to the planning demands of sequence initiation. Consistent with this, contralateral motor β-band suppression was stronger for self-generated actions, particularly at sequence onset, but remained present across all moves, indicating that it is not selectively modulated by sequence position in the same way as the RP. Multivariate pattern analysis further showed that self-generated and stimulus-driven actions could be reliably distinguished throughout the entire preparatory period. Taken together, these results show a deep interaction between executive function and self-generated actions and draw attention to the fact that, if a problem can be solved, then actually solving it generally requires executive cognition to trigger self-generated actions, based on a plan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.