ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
Improving operating room efficiency for primary joint replacements in a medium-sized rural community hospital using positive deviance seminars.
Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving operating room (OR) throughput is a constant challenge. Given evidence that positive deviance (PD) sessions to identify excelling individuals and disseminate their strategies lead to improvements in a tertiary care institution, we sought to use PD sessions to increase the success in completing 4 joint arthroplasties in a day in a rural hospital.
methodsWe conducted PD sessions for 13 OR nurses, 4 family physician anesthetists or anesthesiologists, and 2 orthopedic surgeons. Best-performing staff shared strategies. We measured efficiency and agreement, which were then discussed at future PD sessions. Our primary outcome was success in completing 4 joint arthroplasties in a day. We recorded time from the patient being in the OR to anesthesia-ready (anesthesia prep time), time from the patient being anesthesia-ready to surgery start (surgery prep time), procedure length, time from surgery finish to the patient leaving the room (anesthesia finish time), and room turnover time. We collected data before PD sessions (baseline), 1 to 5 months post-PD sessions (short-term follow-up), and 9 to 13 months post-PD sessions (long-term follow-up).
resultsBefore PD sessions, 48.7% of joint arthroplasty days were completed on time. At short- and long-term follow-up, 87.5% and 80.0% were completed on time. The average time to complete 4 cases decreased. Notable changes were made in anesthesia prep time (21 min at baseline, 17 min at both short- and long-term follow-up), and turnover time (30 min at baseline, 25 min at short-term follow-up, 23 min at long-term follow-up).
conclusionOverall, PD sessions in a rural hospital increased success in completing 4 joint arthroplasties in a day with minimal costs, stimulating local strategies for efficiency. Long-term sustainability and applicability to other surgical procedures or specialties is yet to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.