ArticleClinics in shoulder and elbow2026
The limited diagnostic value of "feeling a pop" for identifying acute tendon rupture in workers' compensation shoulder claims.
Article in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen an adult with rotator cuff tendinopathy reports feeling or hearing a pop along with new pain, both the clinician and the patient may inaccurately and unhelpfully expect (framing heuristic) an injury and consider it a compensable work claim.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of 118 people that filed work claims for new shoulder pain where aspects of their care or recovery trajectory triggered a peer review. We collected data on age, sex, reports of hearing or feeling a pop (25%; 29 of 118 patients), and reports of new numbness or tingling (11%; 13 of 118 patients). Five (4%) patients had a possible acute rotator cuff rupture (relatively large defect with good muscle) and 11 (9%) had a long head of biceps rupture, age indeterminate.
resultsAccounting for confounding variables using logistic regression, possibly acute rotator cuff defects and age-indeterminate long head of biceps ruptures were associated with older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18) and the presence of a degenerative rotator cuff defect (OR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.5-24) but not with sensation of a "pop."
conclusionsBased on this evidence, among people claiming injury at work, when a "pop" is reported the clinician should not expect new pathophysiology. Level of evidence: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.