In one paragraphReview in The Plant cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
22 authors.
Gaurav D MoghePlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8761-064X Alen Zimić-SheenPlant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-3266-6823 Dijun ChenState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7456-2511 Gitanjali YadavBiodiversity Informatics Laboratory, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6591-9964 Guangshuo CaoState Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2290-2748 Hale TufanPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5323-4244 Jason WilliamsDNA Learning Center, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-2010 Jędrzej SzymańskiLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Seeland 06466, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1086-0920 Jeongwoon KimBayer Crop Science, St.Louis, MO, United States.
Lucas BustaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Duluth, MN, United States.
Marek MutwilDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-0126 Mirko ZimićLaboratorio de Bioinformática y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-7203-8847 Nicholas J ProvartDepartment of Cell & Systems Biology/Centre for the Analysis of Genome Evolution and Function, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5551-7232 Nokwanda MakungaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7600, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1507-251X Qi SunBioinformatics Facility, Institute of Biotechnology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6140-2204 Robert VanBurenDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-2760 Rose A MarksDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7102-5959 Seung Y RheeDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7572-4762 Yu JiangHorticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4495-3033 Yuying XieDepartment of Computational Mathematics, Science, and Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1049-2219 Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 390686111Innovación y Universidades TED2021-129682B-I00Ministerio de CienciaNational Natural Science Foundation of China T2541063National Research Foundation of South Africa CPRR230503101428Novo Nordisk DBI-2419923Novo Nordisk IOS-2312181Novo Nordisk IOS-2406533Novo Nordisk MCB-2420360Novo Nordisk OISE-2434687NSERC Global Alliance NSERC Discovery ALLRP 597259-24Research Corporation For Science Advancement CS-CSA-2025-040US Department of Energy DE-SC0008769US Department of Energy DE-SC0018277US Department of Energy DE-SC0020366US Department of Energy DE-SC0021286US Department of Energy DE-SC0023160US NSF IOS-2310395US NSF OISE-2434687
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
In recent years, a deluge of big and diverse datasets from hundreds of plant species, coupled with spectacular innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GenAI), has altered the landscape of plant science. These developments are increasingly democratizing the field, reducing the entry barriers to complex data analysis and enabling a new wave of innovative research while introducing new challenges. Therefore, in this era, it is critical that we train the next generation of plant scientists to be AI-literate, ie, not only proficient in using AI but also vigilant about its pitfalls and biases. In this perspective, we call for six strategic shifts necessary for training the next generation of plant scientists. We argue that while maintaining a core focus on subject expertise, educators should simultaneously emphasize development of new AI-forward pedagogical and evaluation frameworks that reward interdisciplinary and critical thinking, human-driven knowledge synthesis, self-directed learning, and conceptual understanding of workflows. For effective critique and sound interpretations based on biological reality, plant scientists must be explicitly trained in recognizing biases underlying GenAI models. Finally, we highlight the structural barriers hindering the equitable and ethical use of GenAI, where awareness and resolution are critical for sustainable growth of the field. Through the above conceptual framework and numerous plant-science-focused illustrative activities, examples, and resources meant for students and educators alike, this Perspective defines high-level emphasis areas for GenAI-enabled scientific training, aimed at creating a more effective, engaged, and adaptive community of plant scientists.
Indexed as
Artificial IntelligenceBotanyPlantsGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumans
Identifiers
PMID42119144
PMCPMC13275178
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390