Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42119037›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2026

Treatment patterns of eosinophilic esophagitis in the biologic era-a real-world analysis.

Jagoda Pokryszka, Michael Weitersberger, Patrick Dinkhauser, Karin Steidl, Thomas Horvatits, Michael Haefner, Lili Kazemi-Shirazi, Gottfried Novacek, Michael Trauner, Wolfgang Sieghart and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jagoda PokryszkaDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7331-587X
Michael WeitersbergerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.
Patrick DinkhauserDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Endocrinology and Rheumatology, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria.
Karin SteidlDepartment of Internal Medicine, Barmherzige Brüder St. Veit/Glan, St. Veit, Austria.
Thomas HorvatitsGastromedics, Eisenstadt, Austria.
Michael Haefner2nd Medical Department, Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria.
Lili Kazemi-ShiraziDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gottfried NovacekDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Michael TraunerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang SieghartImed19, Vienna, Austria.
Hansjoerg SchlagerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Philipp SchreinerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated disease requiring a long-term maintenance treatment. The data on therapy patterns and treatment durability in the biologic era are scarce in a real-world setting. The aim of this project was to provide information on the treatment courses in a real-world setting over past 10 years. Data on demographics, concomitant atopic diseases and treatments were collected retrospectively at seven Austrian centres. The eligible subjects had to start their first therapy between January 2014 and February 2025. In total, 336 patients (30.1% female) were analyzed of whom 34.5% remained on the first line treatment. In a mean time of 7.6 months, a second line treatment was started. The most common first line treatment was swallowed topical corticosteroids (STCs) (54.2%), followed by proton pump inhibitors (22.3%) and food elimination diet (6.0%). In contrast to only a minority who continued on PPI therapy after starting it (21.3%), the majority of patients had ongoing STC treatment (51%). Forty-one (12.2%) patients received a treatment with dupilumab of whom only one as first line treatment (because of multiple type 2 inflammatory diseases) and the majority as second line treatment (57.5%). The reasons for dupilumab were non-response to STC (59%), followed by side effects (24%). 97.6% (40/41) of them remained on dupilumab until the last follow-up. Although most patients receive STC at the beginning, the majority need multiple treatment lines. Dupilumab is used in a tenth of patients due to refractoriness, side-effects or treatment of other type 2 inflammatory diseases.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEosinophilic EsophagitisProton Pump InhibitorsAdolescentAdultAgedAustriaElimination DietsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddupilumabProton Pump Inhibitorsbudesonide orodispersible tabletdupilumabeosinophilic esophagitisrefractory disease

Identifiers

PMID42119037
PMCPMC13166863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.