ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2026
Treatment patterns of eosinophilic esophagitis in the biologic era-a real-world analysis.
Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Laryngeal Manifestations: Pathophysiology, Clinical Overlap, and Diagnostic Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated disease requiring a long-term maintenance treatment. The data on therapy patterns and treatment durability in the biologic era are scarce in a real-world setting. The aim of this project was to provide information on the treatment courses in a real-world setting over past 10 years. Data on demographics, concomitant atopic diseases and treatments were collected retrospectively at seven Austrian centres. The eligible subjects had to start their first therapy between January 2014 and February 2025. In total, 336 patients (30.1% female) were analyzed of whom 34.5% remained on the first line treatment. In a mean time of 7.6 months, a second line treatment was started. The most common first line treatment was swallowed topical corticosteroids (STCs) (54.2%), followed by proton pump inhibitors (22.3%) and food elimination diet (6.0%). In contrast to only a minority who continued on PPI therapy after starting it (21.3%), the majority of patients had ongoing STC treatment (51%). Forty-one (12.2%) patients received a treatment with dupilumab of whom only one as first line treatment (because of multiple type 2 inflammatory diseases) and the majority as second line treatment (57.5%). The reasons for dupilumab were non-response to STC (59%), followed by side effects (24%). 97.6% (40/41) of them remained on dupilumab until the last follow-up. Although most patients receive STC at the beginning, the majority need multiple treatment lines. Dupilumab is used in a tenth of patients due to refractoriness, side-effects or treatment of other type 2 inflammatory diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.