ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2026
Mortality in relation to smoke exposure 9 years after the Hazelwood coal mine fire.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2014, a coal mine fire in rural Australia shrouded nearby towns in smoke for several weeks. In response to community concerns and a lack of available evidence, the Victorian Department of Health commissioned a long-term health study. This article evaluates smoke effects on mortality 9 years after the fire.
methodsIn 2016-17, 2872 individuals living near the mine during the fire were recruited into a cohort study and consented to linkage of their data. Time-location diaries were blended with estimates of hourly fire-related fine particulate matter ≤2.5 µm (PM2.5) to generate individual exposure measures. Mortality data were obtained up to mid-2023 by linkage with the National Death Index. Cardiac, cancer, and respiratory-related deaths were identifiable up to December 2021 and predicted thereafter to mid-2023. All-cause mortality effects were evaluated with Cox proportional-hazards models and cause-specific mortality with a competing risk survival model.
resultsNine years post-fire, 318 (11%) of the sample had died. All-cause mortality was not associated with PM2.5 exposure. There was no detectable effect on cancer deaths. However, a 10 µg/m3 increase in daily mean exposure to fire-related PM2.5 was associated with an 18% (95% CI: 2%-37%) higher risk of cardiac mortality, while PM2.5 exacerbated risk of respiratory mortality from tobacco use.
conclusionFire-related PM2.5 increased cardiac mortality and smoking effects on respiratory mortality years after the event. These findings concord with a growing body of evidence on the deadly risks of wildfire smoke. Protecting communities and individuals from smoke during and after large fire events should be a public health priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.