Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118991›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2026

Isocycloseram susceptibility baseline, and control failure likelihood in Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae).

Ryan Fernando Silva E Silva, Carlos Gustavo da Cruz, Lariça Ferreira Silva, Maria Elisa de Sena Fernandes, Flávio Lemes Fernandes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan Fernando Silva E SilvaInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Rio Paranaíba, MG, Brazil.
Carlos Gustavo da CruzInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Rio Paranaíba, MG, Brazil.
Lariça Ferreira SilvaInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Rio Paranaíba, MG, Brazil.
Maria Elisa de Sena FernandesInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Rio Paranaíba, MG, Brazil.
Flávio Lemes FernandesInstituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Rio Paranaíba, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0532-8593

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq 304913/2018-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq 313288/2021-6Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico-CNPq 409709/2018-2Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-CAPES 001Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária-EMBRAPA Café 10.18.20.051.00.00Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária-EMBRAPA Café 10.18.20.051.00.05Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais-FAPEMIG APQ-02345-21Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais-FAPEMIG RED-00056-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coffee leaf miner is a key pest of coffee in Brazil, controlled mostly by chemical insecticides. The recent introduction of isocycloseram (group 30) requires baseline susceptibility data to support resistance management programs. This study established the baseline susceptibility and monitored the resistance of coffee leaf miner populations to isocycloseram in the main coffee-producing regions of Brazil. Fourteen field populations were collected between June and October 2024 for the baseline assays, while 22 populations were monitored until 2024 and 2025. The bioassays revealed significant geographic variation in susceptibility, with lethal concentration LC50 values ranging 7.5-fold (0.95 to 7.11 mg a.i. L-1). Despite this, all populations remained susceptible, with resistance ratio (RR50) ≤ 1.0, indicating absence of preexisting resistance. The diagnostic concentration bioassays showed consistently high mortality (>90%), confirming continuous susceptibility. Efficacy trials with the label dose (150 mg a.i. L-1) resulted in mortality between 93% and 100%, with negligible probability of control failure. The diagnostic concentrations (LC99 = 39.76 mg a.i. L-1) may be used in future monitoring. The monitoring and the adoption of integrated resistance management strategies are fundamental to preserve the long-term efficacy of this insecticide.

Indexed as

Insect ControlInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesMothsAnimalsBrazilInsecticidesbaseline susceptibilitycoffeeisoxazolineresistant

Identifiers

PMID42118991
PMCPMC13166885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.