ArticleBlood advances2026
Clinical implications of RAS mutations in AML: prognostic significance is based upon the involved gene and mutation complexity.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease with complex mutational profiles that lead to variable clinical outcomes. NRAS and KRAS are among the most frequently mutated genes in AML, but their clinical impact has not been well characterized. In this cohort of >2000 children and young adults with AML, we evaluated the role of mutations in RAS genes and mutation complexity in outcome determination. Given enrichment in KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) AML, we specifically studied the significance of RAS mutations in KMT2A-r AML. Using variant calls from next-generation sequencing platforms, we identified RAS mutations in 35.1% (N = 669; NRAS, n = 518; KRAS, n = 216). We demonstrated that NRAS mutations were not associated with outcome in AML or in KMT2A-r AML. In contrast, KRAS mutations demonstrated inferior outcomes in AML, with enrichment of prevalence and enhancement of prognostic implications in KMT2A-r AML, including non-high-risk KMT2A fusions. Additionally, we describe a complex RAS (Comp-RAS) mutation cohort characterized by 2 distinct RAS mutations or high variant allele frequency RAS mutations that collectively account for 13.5% (n = 90) of the patients with RAS mutations. Patients with complex KRAS mutations and those with Comp-RAS mutations in the KMT2A-r cohort had a distinctly adverse outcome, and data demonstrate that Comp-RAS status drives adverse outcomes for those with KRAS mutations in the whole AML cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.