ArticlePloS one2026
The urban green carbon index (UGCI): A spatial framework for suggesting urban carbon management.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhancing carbon (C) sequestration in urban green spaces is essential for urban carbon neutrality; yet the spatial heterogeneity and structural complexity of urban landscapes hinder the development of targeted, actionable management strategies. This study introduces a decision-support framework that integrates a novel Urban Green Carbon Index (UGCI) with a multi-dimensional analytical approach for assessing and guiding urban C management. The UGCI combines 30 m-resolution spatial data on vegetation C storage, soil C storage, net C uptake, and soil C storage potential, and identifies the three most influential components based on the weights derived from their spatial variability. The multi-dimensional approach depicts the relative importance among the three core UGCI components, thereby enabling site-specific and component-focused management directions. A case study in Suwon, South Korea, showed that the UGCI captured pronounced within-patch heterogeneity, recording 21-45% lower values at edges compared with interiors, thereby identifying specific locations within green patches where localized management to improve C conditions is most warranted. Based on the limited components revealed by the ternary analysis, tailored management practices, such as surface litter retention, soil decompaction, and multi-layered planting, were proposed to improve the weaker C components. This framework provides a scientifically grounded and policy-ready basis for spatially explicit diagnosis and management of urban C, supporting a transition from generalized greening efforts toward quantifiable, site-specific C enhancement strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.