ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
Network structure induced bias in estimates of intrinsic generation times.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The generation interval, defined as the time taken by an infector to create another infection from its time of infection, is a crucial quantity to be estimated during an infectious disease outbreak. It informs the timescale of the epidemic unfolding and makes it possible to calculate the basic reproductive ratio, which quantifies the transmission potential of an infection, from incidence data. While the intrinsic generation interval remains stable during an outbreak in the absence of interventions and behavioural changes, the generation intervals of successful infection events, 'realised generation intervals', change over time depending on the dynamics of the epidemic and how data are aggregated to define either the forward or the backward generation intervals. These time varying distributions are well understood for homogeneous, well-mixed populations, and can be used to infer the intrinsic generation interval distribution. For heterogeneous populations, the state-of-the-art method relies on the use of expensive network-based or agent-based simulations. We use the edge-based compartmental modelling framework to develop exact formulae for the generation time distribution of a Markovian SIR infection spreading on a heterogeneous contact network. These formulae are validated using stochastic outbreak simulations and relate backward and forward generation intervals with the intrinsic generation intervals. Finally, we use our results to demonstrate some previously unexplored biases in the estimation of the intrinsic generation times from the realised one, which could be caused by the incorrect assumptions about the network structure in the model and particularly the temporal structure of contacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.