ArticlePloS one2026
Sorghum utilization in grain-based food products in China and Australia.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sorghum consumption has potential health-promoting effects for consumers. This study identified sorghum-containing grain-based food products available in major supermarkets in China and Australia. A total of 1,692 products were audited in Shenzhen, China and Illawarra, Australia, in 2023/24. Breakfast cereals and snack bars were evaluated in both countries, while flours, pastas, and noodles were evaluated only in Australia. Information on ingredients, including the presence of sorghum, food format, brand, product name, wholegrain/gluten-free labelling was recorded. In China, sorghum was found in 4.3% (12/279) of breakfast cereals, with only 1/12 sorghum-containing breakfast cereals listed sorghum in the first position of the ingredient list. Sorghum was found in 2.0% (9/458) of snack bars and was listed as either 'sorghum' (n = 3) or 'sorghum flour' (n = 6). In Australia, sorghum was found in 22/356 (6.2%) breakfast cereals, 9/285 (3.2%) snack bars, and was absent from all flours, pastas, and noodles. Most sorghum-containing cereals were extruded (36.4%) and labelled gluten-free (16/22, 73%) or wholegrain (14/22, 64%). Sorghum-containing snack bars, notably oat-bake and muesli bars, were mostly made from sorghum flour and flakes. Sorghum appeared in the first position in the ingredient list in 2/22 (9.1%) of breakfast cereals, and in the third or higher position for all snack bars. Among the breakfast cereal and snack bar subcategories analyzed, there were no significant differences in sorghum utilization between China and Australia (Fisher's Exact Tests, p < 0.05), except for oat bake snack bars (higher in China, p = 0.0265). Overall, the audit data suggests that sorghum is not widely incorporated as an ingredient in common grain-based food products available to consumers in major Chinese and Australian supermarkets. Greater awareness of its potential consumer health benefits is needed to drive utilization of sorghum grain in foods across different markets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.