Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118778›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Oral carbohydrate sensing enhances prefrontal cortex oxygenation, reduces perceived exertion, and improves high-intensity cycling performance: A randomized crossover trial.

Seung-Bo Park, Kyungjin Oh, Geonwoo Yang, Taenam Kim, Jea Woog Lee, Hyung-Jin Jeon, Doug Hyun Han

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07099807 (Carbohydrate Mouth Rinsing Enhances Prefrontal Cortex Oxygenation and Cognitive Performance, Reducing Perceived Exertion During High-Intensity Exercise), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07099807 nacompletednot on this map

Carbohydrate Mouth Rinsing Enhances Prefrontal Cortex Oxygenation and Cognitive Performance, Reducing Perceived Exertion During High-Intensity Exercise

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHA UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled11ConditionsExercise Performance of Fit AthletesArmsCarbohydrate Mouth Rinse, Placebo Mouth Rinse, Music Listening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seung-Bo ParkGraduate School of Sports Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2975-057X
Kyungjin OhDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Geonwoo YangGraduate School of Sports Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Taenam KimGraduate School of Sports Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jea Woog LeeCollege of Sports Science, Chung-Ang University, Anseong, Republic of Korea.
Hyung-Jin JeonGraduate School of Sports Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Doug Hyun HanDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCarbohydrate mouth rinsing (CHO-MR) and music listening (MUS) are non-metabolic interventions proposed to attenuate cognitive and perceptual fatigue during exercise. However, their comparative effects on prefrontal cortical oxygenation, executive function, and perceived exertion during high-intensity endurance performance remain unclear. This study examined the effects of CHO-MR and MUS on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) oxygenation, cognitive performance, perceived exertion, and cycling performance during a 4-km time trial (TT).

methodsEleven trained cyclists (7 men, 4 women) completed a randomized, single-blind, crossover trial under three conditions: CHO-MR, MUS (120 beats/min), and placebo mouth rinse (PLA). Bilateral DLPFC oxygenation was assessed using functional near-infrared spectroscopy at rest, during Stroop testing, post-intervention, and post-TT. Stroop performance, rating of perceived exertion (RPE); every 500 m, completion time, power output, heart rate, and blood lactate were measured. Outcomes were analyzed using generalized estimating equations adjusted for period, sequence, and first-order carryover effects with robust standard errors.

resultsCHO-MR increased bilateral DLPFC oxygenation compared with MUS and PLA at post-intervention and post-TT time points (p < 0.05), with no differences at rest or baseline. Stroop performance was superior in CHO-MR relative to MUS and PLA following the TT (p < 0.001), without between-condition differences at earlier assessments. RPE was lower in CHO-MR than PLA across all intervals (p ≤ 0.01) and lower than MUS at mid-trial distances (p < 0.05). CHO-MR resulted in faster completion times, greater mean power output, and higher mean speed compared with MUS and/or PLA (p < 0.05), whereas peak power, heart rate, and blood lactate did not differ among conditions. Pooled change-score analyses demonstrated positive associations between bilateral ΔDLPFC oxygenation (p < 0.001) and between ΔDLPFC oxygenation and ΔStroop performance (p < 0.05).

conclusionCHO-MR enhances bilateral DLPFC oxygenation, preserves executive function, and reduces perceived exertion during high-intensity endurance exercise, translating into improved performance without detectable peripheral metabolic alterations. These findings support a central neurocognitive mechanism underlying the ergogenic effects of oral carbohydrate sensing.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT07099807.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceBicyclingDietary CarbohydratesOxygenPhysical ExertionPrefrontal CortexAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMouthwashesOxygen ConsumptionSingle-Blind MethodSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredDietary CarbohydratesMouthwashesOxygen

Identifiers

PMID42118778
PMCPMC13166947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.