Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42118747›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Spatial coding of conspecifics in the electrosensory system: Early segregation of information streams.

Oak E Milam, Gary Marsat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oak E MilamDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States of America.
Gary MarsatDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-049X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Localizing the source of a signal requires sophisticated neural mechanisms, and we are still uncovering the coding principles that support accurate spatial processing. Weakly electric fish can detect and localize distant conspecifics, but the way this spatial information is encoded is unclear. Here, we investigate the spatial representation of conspecific signals in the hindbrain to determine how the properties of the heterogeneous population of pyramidal cells affect the spatial coding accuracy of conspecific signals. We hypothesize that specific subsets of cells provide more accurate spatial information about conspecific location. We stimulated the fish with an artificial signal that replicates both the spatial and temporal structure of conspecific signals. We recorded from cells with various receptive field positions covering the entire body surface and analyzed the spike train with spike-train distance metrics to determine how accurately the location of the stimulus is encoded. We found that some pyramidal cells (such as ON-type and those within the deep layer) encode the spatial information more accurately, while other subgroups (OFF-type and superficial layer) provide less accurate information. Our results help us understand how conspecific location is represented across the heterogeneous population of cells and suggest that segregation of the spatial information stream begins early in the sensory pathway.

Indexed as

Electric FishElectric OrganAction PotentialsAnimalsPyramidal Cells

Identifiers

PMID42118747
PMCPMC13166950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.