ArticlePloS one2026
Scleral exposure influences social judgments of trustworthiness, attractiveness, sociability, and social rank in White faces.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faces are powerful sources of social information, and the eye region plays a central role in shaping first impressions. While prior studies have suggested that scleral exposure may influence social judgments, findings remain inconsistent, and experimental approaches, nonexistent. The present study employed a controlled experimental design to explore how scleral exposure might influence judgments of trustworthiness, attractiveness, sociability, and perceived social rank in peer-related facial perception. A total of 162 participants rated 50 neutral faces twice, each digitally manipulated to display small and large scleral exposure. Results showed a consistent "scleral exposure effect": across all measured social judgments, faces with larger scleral exposure were rated more favorably than the same faces with smaller scleral exposure. No interactions emerged between scleral exposure and sex of the raters or sex of the presented faces, indicating that these scleral exposure effects may reflect general sex-independent mechanisms. These findings provide the first experimental evidence that scleral exposure shapes multiple dimensions of social judgment, favoring greater exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.